5/3/1 Boring But Big

This article is verified by 2 studies/publications.

Plan overview

Muscle focus

See how the planned working sets are spread across muscle groups.

Loading training plans…

Boring But Big adds substantial supplemental volume to Jim Wendler’s 5/3/1 strength work. After the main lift, you perform five sets of ten at a lighter load. The repeated work is the defining feature: this is a strength-and-size template for lifters who can recover from more than a minimal routine.

Who this plan suits

Choose it if you know the barbell lifts and want a clear way to add muscle-building work. Four lifting days are used in the example below. The supplemental squat and deadlift sets can be demanding, so an established habit of training and recovery matters more than the programme’s simple appearance.

Schedule and workout structure

The tables show the opening five-repetition week. The first three sets are the main 5/3/1 work; the following five are the lighter supplemental work. Follow the author’s training-max percentages and later-week changes. The assistance exercises and their fixed repetition counts below are training.fit choices within the template, not a unique mandatory selection. The calculation describes this week.

A

Exercise Sets Repetitions
Standing barbell overhead press 3 5, 5, 5+
Standing barbell overhead press 5 10
Cable Lat Pulldown 5 10

B

Exercise Sets Repetitions
Deadlift 3 5, 5, 5+
Deadlift 5 10
Reverse Crunches 5 10

C

Exercise Sets Repetitions
Bench Press 3 5, 5, 5+
Bench Press 5 10
Cable Lat Pulldown 5 10

D

Exercise Sets Repetitions
Barbell Squats 3 5, 5, 5+
Barbell Squats 5 10
Reverse Crunches 5 10

How progression works

Main lifts progress through the selected 5/3/1 cycle. Use a training max and begin the supplemental work conservatively. The author suggests roughly 30% of the training max for people new to BBB, with heavier supplemental loads developed over later cycles. Do not add a large accessory programme on top simply because the exercise list looks short. Conditioning should fit your goals and recovery.

What the science says

A dose-response review associated higher weekly volume with gains but also diminishing returns. BBB’s added sets increase the workload; the review does not show that its exact five-by-ten prescription is optimal. [1]

Concurrent aerobic and strength training were broadly compatible in a meta-analysis, while explosive strength could be affected. That finding does not guarantee unlimited conditioning will fit a high-volume lifting template. [2]

These papers examine training principles and prescriptions. They do not establish that 5/3/1 Boring But Big is superior to other well-designed programmes.

Programme source and version

This is the four-day, same-lift example from Wendler’s public BBB article. The alternate-lift version and later book templates remain separate choices. Jim Wendler: programme source.

5/3/1 Boring But Big alternative exercises

You can perform the following exercises as alternatives to 5/3/1 Boring But Big.

Filter the exercises below by muscle group and difficulty.

Exercise Main muscle group Difficulty Type of training
Barbell Bench Squat Thigh training

Hard

Compound exercise
Barbell Squats Thigh training

Hard

Compound exercise
Bench Press Triceps training

Medium

Compound exercise
Cable Lat Pulldown Upper back

Easy

Compound exercise
Deadlift Thigh training

Hard

Compound exercise
Reverse Crunches Abs workout

Medium

Isolation exercise
Safety Bar Squat Thigh training

Hard

Compound exercise
Smith Machine Bench Press Chest training

Medium

Compound exercise
Smith Machine Squats Thigh training

Medium

Compound exercise
Trap Bar Deadlift Thigh training

Medium

Compound exercise

Sources

  1. The Resistance Training Dose Response: Meta-Regressions Exploring the Effects of Weekly Volume and Frequency on Muscle Hypertrophy and Strength Gains. Pelland JC et al. Sports Medicine. 2026; 56(2):481-505. doi: 10.1007/s40279-025-02344-w.
  2. Compatibility of Concurrent Aerobic and Strength Training for Skeletal Muscle Size and Function: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Schumann M et al. Sports Medicine. 2022; 52(3):601-612. doi: 10.1007/s40279-021-01587-7.

More about the topic